|
| | | | |
|
 | | HEALTH CLAIMS BASED ONLY ON HUMAN INTERVENTION STUDIES
NOT PRACTICAL SAYS IADSA | | | International Alliance of Dietary/Food Supplement Associations (IADSA) | | 13/08/2008 | | | Health claims based only on human intervention studies
not practical says IADSA
11 August 2008
Basing the criteria for substantiating health claims only on evidence from human intervention studies is not practical, the International Alliance of Dietary/Food Supplement Associations (IADSA) has said.
Commenting on the latest draft Codex Alimentarius recommendations for the scientific basis of health claims, IADSA said that while the clinical trial model is one source of scientific data, it is not practical when applied to the reduction of risk of disease in persons generally regarded as ‘healthy’.
The text, which is being revised by an electronic working group of which IADSA is a member, states that short-term human intervention studies in healthy subjects should be the prime source of evidence in claims substantiation. It also makes no reference to evidence based on traditional knowledge and history of use.
The previous draft was sent back to the drawing board last year following concerns over the structure of the document and the weight given to the different types of evidence required for scientific substantiation.
“It is scientific dogma to state that health claims should be based primarily on well designed human intervention studies,” said Professor David Richardson, Scientific Adviser to the UK Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) and IADSA. “Much of what is already known about human health cannot be validated using ‘gold standard’ clinical trials. These studies are, of course, important, but they provide only one source of information. All sources of scientific data have inherent limitations, hence the need to focus on the totality of the available data and weighing of the evidence.”
IADSA referred to the approach taken in the draft as “medicine-based, aimed at deciding whether a drug can prevent, cure or alleviate a disease or medical condition in the treatment of well-defined groups of people at high risk of disease or already with a disease”. However, IADSA argued that nutrition studies in healthy people require a large sample sizes, long-term follow up, high rates of compliance and the taking into account of other lifestyle factors.
Professor Richardson said: “The scientific evidence to support the diet and health relationships for dietary guidelines and health claims for fruits and vegetables, and for whole grain cereals, are based mainly on human observational studies, not clinical interventions.”
The text, which will go through an eight-step process to completion, will be presented at the next Codex Nutrition Committee meeting in November this year.
ENDS | |
|
| | | View similar articles: | | |
| | | |
|
 | People who viewed this article were also interested in |  | |  |
|
| Other articles from International Alliance of Dietary/Food Supplement Associations (IADSA) | | | |
|